On this page

Check the person and the source list

The Consolidated Screening List combines specified Commerce, State and Treasury lists as an aid. Commerce says apparent matches need further diligence and confirmation against the official source list. A fuzzy-name score measures similarity, not the chance a transaction is lawful.

Names, aliases, identifiers and addresses help match the actual party. Then identify the restriction associated with that particular list and person; not all list entries have the same effect.

Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration: Key Considerations; official source-list confirmation; search score

Why multiplying the percentages can miss the result

OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule concerns relevant direct or indirect ownership of 50% or more in aggregate by blocked persons. In the cited illustration, a blocked person owns 50% of A, making A blocked; A owns 50% of B, which can in turn make B blocked. Looking only at 50% × 50% = 25% misses that intermediate-entity treatment.

Control without 50% aggregate ownership is not automatic blocking under this ownership rule. But other designation/blocking criteria or dealings involving a blocked representative can still matter. Below 50% is not universal permission.

Sources: U.S. Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control: Question, explanation and five ownership examples U.S. Department of the Treasury, OFAC: Complete answer: ownership, control and other blocking criteria

The deal has separate restrictions

A distributor with no apparent name match still needs its relevant ownership and proposed goods, destination and use examined. Party screening alone does not settle technology, end-use, country-programme or authorisation requirements. A country connection is not necessarily a blanket ban either. Revisit the answer when the parties, ownership, goods or restrictions change.

Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration: Key Considerations; official source-list confirmation; search score U.S. Department of the Treasury, OFAC: Complete answer: ownership, control and other blocking criteria

Scope

  • No live designation check, export classification, licence or transaction authorisation is provided here.

Next step

Resolve the actual identity, relevant ownership and transaction restrictions before relying on a clean-name result.

Sources & review notes

The source records distinguish access dates from substantive review dates. Updating an explanation does not itself recheck the law.

Consolidated Screening List: use, source lists and limitations

U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration

Passage, dates and research notes

official-guidance · Key Considerations; official source-list confirmation; search score

may be used as an aid

Accessed: 2026-11-13T00:52:28.519030+00:00 · Meaning reviewed: 2026-11-12 · Next review target: 2026-12-12

Read key considerations and tools plus source-list descriptions. CSL is an aid; apparent matches need diligence and official source confirmation. Fuzzy name score is similarity, not legal risk/clearance. No listed-person search or current designation outcome performed.

FAQ 401: indirect ownership under OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule

U.S. Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control

Passage, dates and research notes

official-guidance · Question, explanation and five ownership examples

50 percent or more in the aggregate by one or more blocked persons

Accessed: 2026-11-12T21:20:40.835579+00:00 · Meaning reviewed: 2026-11-12 · Next review target: 2026-12-12

Read full ownership explanation and examples. This source explains blocking ownership; control below 50%, other directives and designation grounds require separate analysis. No list search or ownership clearance was performed.

OFAC FAQ 398: control versus ownership under the 50 Percent Rule

U.S. Department of the Treasury, OFAC

Passage, dates and research notes

official-guidance · Complete answer: ownership, control and other blocking criteria

speaks only to ownership and not to control

Accessed: 2026-11-13T00:53:26.087598+00:00 · Meaning reviewed: 2026-11-12 · Next review target: 2026-12-12

Read full answer. Control below 50% is not automatic blocking under this ownership rule; designation/other criteria and dealing with a blocked signatory may still matter. No country programme, general/specific licence or transaction is cleared.

Detailed rule records (1)
A name search is one part of sanctions and export diligence Depends on the facts

Commerce describes CSL as an aid requiring source-list and match diligence. OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule can block entities owned 50% or more in aggregate by blocked persons even without a separate name listing; ownership and control are distinct underFAQ 398.

When to check: A name search is one part of sanctions and export diligence. Source review: 2026-11-12.

Consolidated Screening List: use, source lists and limitations FAQ 401: indirect ownership under OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule OFAC FAQ 398: control versus ownership under the 50 Percent Rule
Your learning

Keep this reading in your learning library.

Open learning hub
Progress privacy

Off by default. Without remembering, changes last on this page. If enabled, only public content identifiers and self-reported progress are stored in this browser profile. Anyone using the same profile could see them. No plan inputs or contact details are included. Reset or export in learning settings.

This is a reading aid, not evidence of disclosure delivery, expertise or legal approval.